National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland

June 9, 2016 | Journal Article

Authors: Sarah-Jo Sinnott , Aoife Brick , Richard Layte , Nathan Cunningham , Michael J Turner
PLOS ONE , 9 June , 2016 , pp. 1-13

Objective

Internationally, caesarean section (CS) rates are rising. However, mean rates of CS across providers obscure extremes of CS provision. We aimed to quantify variation between all maternity units in Ireland.

Methods

Two national databases, the National Perinatal Reporting System and the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry Scheme, were used to analyse data for all women delivering singleton births weighing ≥500g. We used multilevel models to examine variation between hospitals in Ireland for elective and emergency CS, adjusted for individual level sociodemographic, clinical and organisational variables. Analyses were subsequently stratified for nullipara and multipara with and without prior CS.

Results

The national CS rate was 25.6% (range 18.2% ─ 35.1%). This was highest in multipara with prior CS at 86.1% (range 6.9% ─ 100%). The proportion of variation in CS that was attributable to the hospital of birth was 11.1% (95% CI, 6.0 ─ 19.4) for elective CS and 2.9% (95% CI, 1.4 ─ 5.6) for emergency CS, after adjustment. Stratifying across parity group, variation between hospitals was greatest for multipara with prior CS. Both types of CS were predicted by increasing age, prior history of miscarriage or stillbirth, prior CS, antenatal complications and private model of care.

Conclusion

The proportion of variation attributable to the hospital was higher for elective CS than emergency CS suggesting that variation is more likely influenced by antenatal decision making than intrapartum decision making. Multipara with prior CS were particularly subject to variability, highlighting a need for consensus on appropriate care in this group.

  • Publication Details

    Journal Article

    ESRI Series Number: 201619
    Research Area: Health and Quality of Life
    Date of Publication: June 9, 2016
    Published Online: June 09, 2016
    Publisher: PLOS
    View External Link
    Rights:

    Open Access


© 2015 The Economic and Social Research Institute. All rights reserved. Website by JET Design