The distributional impact of pension auto-enrolment
ESRI working papers represent un-refereed work-in-progress by researchers who are solely responsible for the content and any views expressed therein. Any comments on these papers will be welcome and should be sent to the author(s) by email. Papers may be downloaded for personal use only.
|Download PDF||854.96 KB|
The Irish government plan to introduce pension auto-enrolment in the coming years. Subject to certain age and earnings thresholds, employees not covered by a supplementary pension will be auto enrolled into a retirement savings scheme. It is anticipated the initial employee contribution rate will be 1.5% rising to 6% after a number of years. While individuals can opt out of the scheme, this can only be done after an initial 6-month period. Those opting out of the scheme can receive a refund of their contributions after this 6-month period, however affordability issues may arise for some during these initial 6 months. In this paper we examine the distributional, poverty and inequality impacts of pension auto-enrolment. We find that the largest negative impact will be felt in quintile 4, followed by quintile 3 – i.e. the middle income ranges. The bottom two income quintiles will see the smallest fall in disposable income. These results are driven by the fact that only 1% of family units in the lowest quintile and 7% in the second quintile will actually be affected by auto-enrolment due to lower employment incomes in these quintiles. There is no notable differing impact by gender, if anything women in lower income deciles face smaller losses – either because they do not work, do not earn enough to be auto-enrolled or are more likely to be covered already by an occupational pension due to their higher concentration in the public sector. There will be little impact on the at-risk-of-poverty rate. This is explained by the distributional impact findings whereby the largest negative impacts on disposable income were found for the upper income quintiles, for whom the 1.5% contribution rate examined is not sufficient to push them below the poverty line. These findings also hold for a higher 6% contribution rate.